GORI SHANKAR GOYAL AND ANR v. CHANDER SHEKHAR KHARE, CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, HSVP AND ANR
COCP/607/2025 · 2025-03-19
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133553 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133553 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.607 of 2025
IN TH 214-U
GORI SHANKA
Vs CHANDER SHE ANR
CORAM: HON'
Present:
Mr. J
Mr.
for th
Mr. A
Mr. H
for th
HARKESH MAN
1.
Com Collector, Urban record.
2.
Lear compensation st
3.
In vi instant petition. T still aggrieved, th
4.
Rule
March 19, 2025 Atik Whe Whe 025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.
Date of De NKAR GOYAL AND ANR
SHEKHAR KHARE, CHIEF ADM
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Aman Chawariya, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondents.
**** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Compliance affidavit of Ms. Anupm rban Estates, Gurugraum has been fil
Learned counsel for the respond on stands released in favour of the peti In view of above, no further orders tion. The same stands disposed of, ho ed, they would be at liberty to avail th Rule stands discharged.
(HA 5
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable
Yes/N
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.607 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 19.03.2025
......Petitioners ADMINISTRATOR, HSVP AND
....Respondents ESH MANUJA te for nupma Malik, HCS, Land Acquisitio een filed in Court, the same is taken o spondents submits that payment o he petitioners. orders are required to be passed in th of, however, in case the petitioners a vail their legal remedies, as per law.
(HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
1 uisition aken on ent of d in the ners are
MOHMED ATIK 2025.03.20 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment