Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21227 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2099 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neeraj Yadav Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer, Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. At the very outset, learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that inadvertently the proper necessary opposite party could not be arrayed in the memo of petition and as such he may be permitted to implead the proper opposite party. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to implead the necessary opposite party during the course of the day. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "(i) issue a direction to the opposite party No. 1, i.e. Sub-Divisional Officer, Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Recall application dated 6.11.2023 filed by the opposite party No. 2 in Case No. T20214040400039 "Munni Lal & another Versus Gaon Sabha", under section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006, pending in the court of Sub- Divisional Officer, Alapur, District- Ambedkar Nagar alongwith the substitution application dated 9.9.2024 filed by the petitioner, expeditiously within stipulated period as early as possible, pending since 6.11.2023." Taking note of the fact that application(s) in issue, are pending since November 2023 and September 2024, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No.-1 to consider and decide the pending application(s) dated 06.11.2023 and 09.09.2024, detailed in the prayer clause, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is also expected from the concerned authority to conclude the proceedings within the aforesaid period. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench