JYOTI PRASAD PANDEY @ JYOTI PRASAD v. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR MISHRA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT.-I, PRATAPGARH
CAPL/1016/2023 · 2025-02-04
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133536 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7062 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1016 of 2023 Applicant :- Jyoti Prasad Pandey @ Jyoti Prasad Opposite Party :- Sri Santosh Kumar Mishra, Executive Engineer, Public Works Deptt.-I, Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar,Vivek Kumar Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Sri Ajay Kumar, Executive Engineer, PWD-I Pratapgarh i.e. respondent no.2 has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that for all practical purposes the present contempt application has become infructuous as the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with but there is dispute regarding the amount shown to be credited in the account of the applicant. He has further submitted that the present contempt petition may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty may be given to the applicant if he is still aggrieved he may file writ petition.
3. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as such.
4. Notice, if any, stands discharged.
5. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy, if he is aggrieved, as may be permissible under the law. Order Date :- 4.2.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench