[2025:RJ-JP:20147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4851/2025 Radheshyam S/o Patram Jat, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Village Jatwara, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Prnanayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Alwar 3. Blok Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kathumar, District Alwar 4. Gram Panchayat Jatwara, Panchayat Samiti Kathumar District Alwar Through Village Development Officer 5. M. J. Enterprises, 119-B, Ist Floor, Wonder Mall, Alwar Through Its Proprietor ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishanlal Meena for Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 13/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment. This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to pay the petitioner due salary since May, 2024 and to permit him to continue to work as Security Guard at Gram Panchayat Jatwara (Kathumar), District Alwar. On 01.05.2025, this Court passed the following order:- “Indisputably, services of the petitioner were hired through placement agency and he has no privity of contract with the State Government. [2025:RJ-JP:20147] (2 of 2) [CW-4851/2025] In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted time to satisfy this Court as to maintainability of the writ petition. List the matter on 08.05.2025 as prayed.” Thereafter, on 08.05.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for and was granted further time to complete his instructions in terms of the order dated 01.05.2025. Today also, learned counsel prays for an adjournment. However, in view of the aforesaid facts, the prayer is rejected. A coordinate Bench of this Court has, in the case of Amita Singh versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4381/2024 and other connected matters involving identical controversy, vide its order dated 23.04.2024, relying upon the dictum of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of K.K. Suresh & Anr. versus Food Corporation of India: AIR 2018 SC 3905, dismissed the writ petitions holding that in absence of privity of contract in between the petitioners and the official respondents, they were not entitled for any relief. Indisputably, the facts in the case of Amita Singh (supra) and in the instant case are identical. In view thereof, this civil writ petition is also dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/14