Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133507 (ALL)

RAM UJAGIR MANIK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/3114/2025 · 2025-04-16

Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21266-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3114 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Ujagir Manik and another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.A. for State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- “I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned first information report dated 25.03.2025 lodged at FIR No.218 of 2025, under Sections 281, 285, 132, 189(2), 195(1), 190, 126(2) and 352 of B.N.S. and 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby restraining the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioners lodged at FIR No.218 of 2025, under Sections 281, 285, 132, 189(2), 195(1), 190, 126(2) and 352 of B.N.S. and 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur during the pendency of writ petition.” 3. Learned A.G.A., on instructions, says that till date names of the petitioners have not come in light and, therefore, at present police is not looking for the petitioners. 4. Statement is taken on record. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is consigned to record. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary J.) Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench