RAKHI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT/PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/3986/2025 · 2025-04-11
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133502 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133502 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20756 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3986 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakhi Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Child Development/Pushtahar Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardan Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no. 1 to 4. Notice to respondent no. 5 are dispensed with in view of the proposed order. By this petition, the petitioner seeks for the following prayers:-
"i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the appointment of the private respondent after summoning the record from the concerned authorities who has been appointed on the post of Anganbadi Karyakatri in Gram Panchayat- Damgarha, Centre- Bharauna, Block- Pihani Tehsil Shahabad, District Hardol (contained as ANNEXURE NO. 1) ignoring the norm of law. (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the respondents concerned to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Anganbadi Karyakatri in Gram Panchayat Damgarha, Centre- Bharauna, Block-Pihani Tehsil Shahabad, District- Hardoi in the interest of justice. (iii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding the respondents concerned to consider & decide the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 (contained as ANNEXURE NO. 5) by speaking and reasoned order within stipulated period of time fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be suffice, if respondent no. 2 is directed to take a decision on the petitioner's pending representation regarding his claim which is on record as Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Considering the above, the petitioner is directed to submit a
fresh representation before respondent no. 2 within two weeks from today and in case, such a representation is submitted, the same shall be decided by respondent no. 2 within a further period of four weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 11.4.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench