Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13350 (UTT)

RAVINDRA SINGH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1366/2024 · 2025-04-22

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1366 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.275 of 2024 dated 30.10.2024 for the offences punishable under Section 420 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. 4. Mr. Shakti Singh, learned counsel had instructions to appear on behalf of respondent no.3 in the present case. He is permitted to appear before this Court and he may file his ‘Vakalatnama’ during the course of the day. 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation, the final report has been submitted against the petitioners on 10.04.2025. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, nothing survives to be decided in this petition, therefore, the criminal writ petition is hereby closed. 7. However, it is open to the petitioners to challenge the final report in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate court. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 22.04.2025 Ravi