- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6136 WP No. 773 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 773 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI.AJEETH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O SRI GIRIVASAN A P R/AT NO.100 “RAMESH NIVAS” 12TH CROSS RAMAMURTHY NAGAR BENGALURU 560016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATISH K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMUNINANJAMMA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O LATE MUKUNDAPPA. 2. SMT NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS D/O LATE MUKUNDAPPA BOTH ARE R/AT B CHANNASANDRA KASTURINAGAR BANASWADI POST BANGALORE-560048 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HON’BLE LXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6136 WP No. 773 of 2025 AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY TO CONSIDER THE “COMMISSIONERS REPORT” DATED 21/02/2013 (ANNEXURE B) IN FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS NO. 101/2012 AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER ON THE SAID REPORT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner sought for a direction to the trial court to pass orders on the Commissioner’s report dated 21.02.2013 in FDP No.101/2012. 2. In view of the above, service of notice to the respondents is not necessary. 3. On the basis of the preliminary decree for partition, the parties have filed the final decree proceedings before the competent court in FDP No.101/2012. On the directions of the Court, the Commissioner has been appointed and the Commissioner submitted the report on 21.02.2013. Pursuant to the Commissioner’s report, the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6136 WP No. 773 of 2025 parties have filed objections. The court has not passed any order on the Commissioner’s report. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. 4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the trial court is directed to consider the objections filed by the parties to the Commissioner’s report and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 5. With the above observations the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54