Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133499 (ALL)

DEVENDRA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIB/328/2025 · 2025-04-15

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20991 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 328 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devendra Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 to take final decision on the recommendations dated 18.05.2023, 18.04.2024 and 17.08.2024 relating to cancellation of consolidation proceeding at village Babuwapur, Block-Trivedigaj, Pargana and Tehsil Haidergarh, District Barabanki, contained as Annexure No.4, 8 & 9 respectively to the Writ Petition. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 to issue notification under section 6 of the U.P. Consolidation & Holding Act, 1953 for Village Babuwapur, Block Trivediganj, Tehsil Haidergarh, District Barabanki." Taking note of the pronouncements of this Court on the issue rendered in the case(s) of Suraj Bhan vs. Director, Consolidation, Uttar Pradesh reported in 2006 LawSuit(All) 971, Runup Gramodyog Evam Sewa Sansthan Versus State of U.P. and Others reported in 2022 (155) RD 497 and Daswant Ram Versus Consolidation Commissioner and Others reported in 2015 (126) RD 669, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition for the main relief sought, quoted above. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a detailed representation in terms of Rule 17 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954 (in short "Rules of 1954"), which shall be considered and decided by the Authority concerned in the light of law on the subject including Rule 17 of the Rules of 1954, most expeditiously Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench