Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133472 (PNJ)

TIRATH SINGH v. BALDEV SINGH SARAN

COCP/4845/2024 · 2025-10-27

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 205 Tirath Sin Baldev Si Corporatio CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o predecesso “Balwinder Ltd. and ot the represe of three m order dated this Court i vs. The Pu as order da LPA Nos.1 COCP-4845-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.4845 o Date of decision th Singh Versus ev Singh Saran, Engineer, CMD oration Ltd. District Patiala AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Ravi, Advocate for Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.P.S. Bara, Advocate for HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 18.11.2020 (An ecessor Bench of this Court in C winder Singhand others vs. The Punja and others”, whereby the respondents resentation dated 09.12.2019 (Anne e months, from the date of receip r dated 16.5.2022 (Annexure P-6) pass Court in CWP-22899-2021 titled as “B he Punjab State Power Corporation L der dated 09.4.2024 passed by a Divis Nos.1034 and 696 of 2022 whereby t 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4845 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-27.10.2025 …..Petitioner CMD, Punjab State Power …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA vocate ate for the respondent. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-3) passed by a in CWP-9840-2020 titled as Punjab State Power Corporation dents were directed “….to decide Annexure P-3), within a period ceipt of copy of this order….; passed by co-ordinate Bench of d as “Balwinder Singh and others tion Limited and others”; as well a Division Bench of this Court in reby the respondent was directed VIJAY ASIJA 2025.10.29 09.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document “….to con annual inc petitioner i arrears to CWP No.98 prays for w October 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-4845-2024 (O & M) consider and decide the claim of p l increment within a period of thre ner is found entitled, the same shal to three years and two months pr o.9840 of 2020, vide order dated 18 At the very outset, learned s for withdrawal of the present contem Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 27, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 of petitioner for granting him three months and in case the shall be paid by restricting the s prior to the date of filing of d 18.11.2020 (Annexure P-3)”. arned counsel for the petitioner ontempt petition. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.10.29 09.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document