Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133472 (ALL)

ANURAG VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/4058/2025 · 2025-04-22

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22790 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4058 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anurag Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel who has accepted notice on behalf of respondents. 2.By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to make payment of leave encashment to the petitioner for 176 days which is due to be paid since 1.7.2024 with a further direction to respondents to pay interest @ 10% per annum on the amount of leave encashment, due to be paid since 1.7.2024 till the date of actual payment. 3.Learned Addl. Chief Standing counsel in compliance of earlier order dated 15.4.2025 passed by this court has provided written instructions which are taken on record. A perusal of the written instructions shows that relevant record for calculating earned leave was not found available, hence, leave encashment amount could not be computed. It is submitted that the decision on petitioner's claim for sanctioning leave encashment after removing defect shall be taken soon. 4.In view of the above, the petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the respondent No.2 within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks from the date of submission of representation along with a copy of this order. In case during the course of decision making process, the respondent No.2 comes to the conclusion that the petitioner is entitled for payment of leave encashment, the same shall be paid to him, without any further delay. As the petitioner has already retired on 30.6.2024, it shall be open for him to claim for the interest on the delayed payment of leave encashment amount, while representing the respondent No.2. Order Date :- 22.4.2025 kkb/ Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench