W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 A.Rajkumar : Petitioner Vs. 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ulla Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai - 625002. 2. The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. : Respondents P RAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue passport to petitioner on the basis of petitioner's application dated 05.02.2025 pending in File No.MD8077375109525 before the first respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sahithya For Respondents : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar CGSC for R1 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2 O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue the passport to the petitioner in application No.MD8077375109525, dated 05.02.2025, within the time stipulated by this Court. 2.The petitioner has made an application dated 05.02.2025, for issuance of passport. While so, on receipt of adverse police verification report, the first respondent had issued a communication dated 24.02.2024, required an explanation from the petitioner. Challenging the same, this Writ Petition is filed. 3. The learned Government Advocate for the second respondent would submit that the matter is still pending in FIR stage and has not resulted in filing a final report. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 4. .Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the entire materials available on record. 5. It is a settled proposition of law that a mere pendency of FIR cannot be a bar for consideration of claim for issuance of passport. This Court in the case of W.Jaihar William Vs State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2014 (2) CWC 684 has held that mere pendency of FIR cannot be construed as pendency of criminal proceedings, unless Judicial Magistrate takes cognizance of the offence, on filing of charge sheet on completion of investigation against the accused. Right to travel abroad is a fundamental right. 6. In view of the same, the first respondent is hereby directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 05.02.2025, for issuance of passport without reference to the FIR lodged against him and issue passport, if he is otherwise eligible for the same. The first respondent shall comply with the said direction on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. 23.04.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 To 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ulla Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai - 625002. 2. The Inspector of Police, South Police Station, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.10426 of 2025 VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. PKN W.P.(MD) No.10426 of 2025 23.04.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis