IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.116 CWP-1030-2025 Date of decision: 02.05.2025 Umed Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI PPresent: Mr. Vikram Singh Punia, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioners. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana with Mr. P.P. Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana for respondent No.1. * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority/Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, Panchkula to take a decision on the representations dated 06.03.2024 and 31.07.2024 (Annexures P-2 & P-3) made by the petitioners. (2) Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioners' above prayer is accepted. (3) Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the aforesaid representations JYOTI SHARMA 2025.05.03 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CWP-1030-2025 -2- made by the petitioners, by passing speaking order(s) and affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (4) Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE May 02, 2025 Jyoti 1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JYOTI SHARMA 2025.05.03 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh