GOKUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
NABAIL/312/2025 · 2025-04-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133442 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133442 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20734 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 312 of 2025 Applicant :- Gokul Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Srees Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Ms. Shivani Tiwari, holding brief of Sri Srees Kumar Srivastava,, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anurag Verma, the learned AGA-I for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 247 of 2024, under Sections 108, 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station Makhi, District Unnao.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 09.08.2024 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that a property dispute is going on between the parties and the concerned person keep on threatening the informant's side in false cases under SC/ST Act and relating to rape. They harassed the informant's son due to which he committed suicide by hanging.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail- application it has been contended that the applicant is innocent, he has no criminal history and he has falsely been implicated in the present case.
5. Three co-accused persons have been granted bail by the sessions court.
6. The learned AGA-I has opposed the bail application and he has produced relevant extract of the case diary for perusal of the Court containing the text of suicide note left by the deceased who stated that he was committing suicide because of
harassment by all the accused persons, including the applicant.
7. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, I am of the view that the
facts of the present case do not warrant exercise of discretion of this Court by granting pre-arrest bail to the applicant.
8. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
9. In case the applicant appears before the trial court and files application for his release on bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law, without being influenced by dismissal of the anticipatory bail application. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench