ARUN KANT PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF ADDL. SOURCE OF ENERGY LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/3964/2025 · 2025-04-11
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20826 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3964 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arun Kant Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Addl. Source Of Energy Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nishant Shukla Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vijay Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party and Sri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:-
"Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the concerned opposite parties that they consider the case of petitioner and provide the actual benefits of order dated 28.11.2015 issued by opposite party No.2 and pay the time scale etc. to the petitioner on completion of 14 years satisfactory service within reasonable time, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate
order strictly in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no. 2 i.e. Director, Non-Conventional Energy Development Agency (NEDA), Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, along with certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such a representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is
disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 11.4.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench