Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133434 (ALL)

PANKAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIB/315/2025 · 2025-04-10

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20279 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 315 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Karan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of present petition, the petitioner has sought the following main relief(s):- "i. A writ, order or direction in nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Parties to defer the Consolidation Proceedings in pursuance to the Report of Assistant Consolidation Officer, as contained in Annexure No.2 & 5 to this Writ Petition during pendency of the instant Writ Petition." Taking note of the pronouncements of this Court on the issue rendered in the case(s) of Suraj Bhan vs. Director, Consolidation, Uttar Pradesh reported in 2006 LawSuit(All) 971 and Runup Gramodyog Evam Sewa Sansthan reported in MANU/UP/1587/2022, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition for the main relief sought, quoted above. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a detailed representation in terms of Rule 17 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Rules, 1954 (in short "Rules of 1954"), which shall be considered and decided by the Authority concerned in the light of law on the subject including Rule 17 of the Rules of 1954, most expeditiously. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench