Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13343 (JK)

GEMINI PRODUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED v. SRINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

WP(C)/1044/2025 · 2025-12-30

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 188 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR (Through Virtual Mode) CM(8953/2025) In WP(C) 1044/2025 Gemini Production Private Limited. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Sameer Hassan, Advocate. Vs. Srinagar Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, Dy. AG. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 30.12.2025 CM(8953/2025): 01. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has preferred a fresh representation before the respondent No. 2-Commissioner, Srinagar Municipal Corporation, Srinagar, which has been placed on record as Annexure-VII along with the instant application. 02. The learned counsel submits that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Commissioner, Srinagar Municipal Corporation, Srinagar, to accord consideration to the said representation, within some reasonable timeframe. 03. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Bikram Deep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General enters appearance on behalf of respondents and is not averse to the disposal of the instant writ petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field and also if there is no other legal impediment. 04. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the material on record. 05. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage as an innocuous prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2- Commissioner, Srinagar Municipal Corporation, Srinagar, to accord due consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner, which has been placed on record as Annexure-VII along with CM No. 8953/2025, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law, if there is no other legal impediment. 06. In addition, if the respondent No. 2 intends to hear the petitioner, in that eventuality, the petitioner shall be put to notice for his appearance and the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce the relevant material before the respondent No. 2 which would facilitate the early disposal of the representation of the petitioner. 07. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondent No. 2, be forwarded to the petitioner by registered post. 08. Writ petition disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner as indicated above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 30.12.2025 <HAMID=