SHRAVAN KUMAR DIXIT v. SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR TYAGI, DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT RAJ U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
CAPL/1063/2025 · 2025-05-14
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28204 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1063 of 2025 Applicant :- Shravan Kumar Dixit Opposite Party :- Shri Rajendra Kumar Tyagi, Director Panchayat Raj U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui,Shiv Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Standing Counsel for State.
2. The present contempt application is filed with the following prayer :
"This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for, dealt with and punish the Opposite Party-Contemnor for deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 19.02.2024 in Writ A No.1203 of 2024 Dr. Shravan Kumar Dixit versus State of U.P. and Another, the photocopy of authentic copy of the order dated 19.02.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court has been annexed as Annexure No.1 to the affidavit filed in support of this contempt application, in the interest of justice."
3. Sri Mohit Jauhari, learned Standing Counsel, has placed before this Court written instruction duly signed by Sri Saumya Sheel Singh, District Panchayat Raj Officer, district Rae Bareily dated 05.05.2025 and informed that all the due amount has already been directed to be credited in the account of the applicant vide order dated 17.03.2025 passed by Additional/Joint Director, Pension, Lucknow Division. The said written instruction is taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel informed the Court that the
order of the writ Court has been complied with by the respondent authority.
4. Considering the contents of the order of writ Court as well as the contents of the written instructions, it is evident that the due amount has already been credited in the account of the applicant therefore, this Court is of the view that since the order of the writ Court has been complied with by the respondent authority, the present contempt application has lost its efficacy.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed. However, it is open to the applicant that in case the due amount is not credited in the account of the applicant, then he may file recall application.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench