COCP No.799 of 2025 IN TH 233-U GURMAIL SING Vs PARAMJIT SING CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. R for th Mr. S HARKESH MAN 1. Lear petitioner appea Department, Punj on 10.03.2025 at followed by pass thereof shall be fo 2. In vi counsel for the pe 3. Dism 4. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a March 06, 2025 Atik Wheth Wheth 025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De SINGH ...... SINGH AND ANOTHER ....Re ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. R.K. Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, Asstt. A.G., P **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instruc appears before the Director, Rur t, Punjab, Vikas Bhawan, Sector 62, S 025 at 11.00 A.M., he shall be affo passing of speaking order thereupo ll be forwarded to the petitioner within In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.799 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 06.03.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents ESH MANUJA .G., Punjab. nstructions submits that in case th , Rural Development & Panchay 62, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) in his offic e afforded an opportunity of hearin ereupon within two weeks and a cop within 07 days thereafter. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne esent petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 ase the nchayat is office hearing a copy learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.03.07 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment