Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133407 (ALL)

MAKHAN LAL @ MAKHNA LAL AND OTHERS v. ADD. COMMISSIONER (ADMINSTRATION), DEVI PATAN MANDAL, GONDA AND OTHERS

A227/2107/2025 · 2025-04-16

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21225 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2107 of 2025 Petitioner :- Makhan Lal @ Makhna Lal And Others Respondent :- Add. Commissioner (Adminstration), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharvan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "Issue a, order or direction to, commanding the opposite party no.1 to deciding the revision filed by opposite party no.4 and 5 vide its case No.556/2022, (Ram Karan & other vs. Makhan Lal and other on dated 24.05.2022 under section 210 U.P. Revenue code 2006 against the order dated 06.04.2022 passed by the opposite party no.2 under section24 of U.P revenue Code relating to Gata No.461 measuring area 1.135 hect. Situated at Village Parsa -Dewtaha, Pargana, Tahsil Bhinga, District Shravasti pending before him expeditiously within stipulated time as provide by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice." It is stated that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the revision is pending since May 2022 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioners are suffering great hardship and mental agony. Prayer is to direct the authority concerned to decide the case within stipulated time. It is further submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Authority concerned to decide the pending revision within 6 months from the next date fixed in the matter, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard, after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation. For conducting the proceedings in the time specified, unnecessary adjournments be avoided. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench