Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1334 (MEG)

GANESH ROY v. SUKLA ROY AND ANR.

MC(CRP)/19/2024 · 2025-03-05

B Bhattacharjee

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(CRP) No.19 of 2024 Date of Order: 05.03.2025 Shri. Ganesh Roy, S/o (L) Birendra Kr. Roy, R/o Nakham Bazar, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …..Applicant -VERSUS- 1. Smti. Sukla Roy, W/o (L) Pejush K. Roy, R/o Nakham Bazar, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. Shri. Prithish Roy, S/o (L) Pejush K. Roy, R/o Nakham Bazar, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …..Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Deb, Adv For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P.R. Paske, Adv (ORAL) Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and also Mr. P.R. Paske, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. By this application, the applicant has sought for condonation of 2025:MLHC:140 2 delay of 47 days in filing the connected civil revision petition against the order dated 05.07.2024, passed in Misc.Case No.9 of 2023, arising out of TS No.6 of 2022, by the learned Assistant to Deputy Commissioner (J) at Tura. The reason for delay has been explained at paragraph 8 of the application. The learned counsel for the respondent also has no serious objection to the prayer for condonation of delay. Perusal of the application makes it clear that sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay of 47 days in preferring the connected Civil revision petition is condoned. This application stands allowed. Registry to diarize the revision and list it for motion. Judge Meghalaya 05.03.2025 “Shrity” 2025:MLHC:140 Digitally signed by SHRITY CH MOMIN Date: 2025.03.05 16:06:29 IST