Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13339 (UTT)

SHIV DAYAL SAINI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1353/2024 · 2025-04-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1353 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Hitesh Sanwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. Rangoli Purohit, B.H. for the State. 3. Delay Condonation Application (IA No.2 of 2025) for condoning delay in filing short counter affidavit is allowed. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation charge sheet have been filed on 31.10.2024 against the petitioner. 5. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.04.2025 SK