Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133387 (ALL)

NIKHIL SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/1159/2025 · 2025-04-21

Alok Mathur

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22254 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1159 of 2025 Appellant :- Nikhil Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Himanshu Tiwari,Vijay Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Himanshu Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. on behalf of the State and Sri Rahul Yadav, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No.2 and filed vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. This appeal has been filed by the appellant for quashing the summoning order dated 27.2.2025 passed by special Judge, (S.C/S.T. (P.A.) Act) in Misc. Criminal Case No.352 of 2025 in case crime No.222/2022 under Sections 504, 505 (1) (B), 67 IPC and 3 (Da) (Dha) and 3(2) (va) of S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, police station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably compromised their dispute vide compromise deed dated 5.3.2025 which has been filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to this appeal, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellant in the aforesaid case. 7. Original copy of compromise, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for appellants, as per Rules of Court. 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 21.4.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench