Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13338 (UTT)

KAILASH CHANDRA v. RAVI NATH RAMAN

CLCON/440/2024 · 2025-07-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON 440/2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder, for the State. (2) Writ Court had directed the State authorities to take decision on petitioner’s representation. (3) Learned State Counsel submits that decision on petitioner’s representation has been taken in terms of the judgment rendered by Writ Court, therefore contempt petition be closed. A compliance affidavit has been filed enclosing therewith an order dated 3.1.2025, passed by Secretary, School Education. (4) This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned State Counsel. Since direction issued was to take decision on petitioner’s representation and after decision on petitioner’s representation, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the contempt petition pending, therefore, contempt petition is closed. Notice is discharged. (5) Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the Writ Court, if he is not satisfied with the decision taken by the Secretary, School Education. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.7.2025 Pr