NEERJA BHARTI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3965/2025 · 2025-04-11
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20820 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3965 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neerja Bharti Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Raj,Garv Saxena,Suyagya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Rishi Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Raghvendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and Sri and Sri Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.4.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:-
"Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for inter district transfer from District Sitapur to District Lucknow, after considering her special circumstances, in he ends of justice."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate
order strictly in accordance with law.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no. 3 i.e. Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Parishad, Allahabad through its Secretary taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, along with certified copy of this
order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such a representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation
and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is
disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 11.4.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench