W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.04.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 Santhoshkumar @ Ramkumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Tamil Nadu Rep By, The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Trichy South Sub-Division Trichy City. 3. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, K.K.Nagar Sub-Division, Trichy City. 4. The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy City. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to remove the petitioner's name in History sheet in H.S.No.116/2013 maintained by the 4th respondent, based on the representation of the petitioner dated.14.03.2025 in accordance with law 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 within time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi (R1-R4) Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to remove the petitioner's name in History sheet in H.S.No. 116/2013 maintained by the 4th respondent, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 14.03.2025 in accordance with law within time stipulated by this Court. 2.According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent maintained history sheet as against the petitioner in HS No. 116/2013, without conducting periodical review in terms of Police Stating Order 746. For the last 5 years, the petitioner has not involved in any case. However, the fourth respondent maintained history sheet against the petitioner, therefore, he has sent a representation on 14.03.2025 to remove his name in the History sheet, but the same has not been considered. Hence, this petition. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police appearing for the respondent police would submit that the fourth respondent maintained history sheet in HS No. 116 of 2013 against the petitioner due to his previous cases. However, the representation of the petitioner is under consideration before the first respondent and the same will be considered in accordance with law. 4.Considering the prayer of the petitioner and the representation of the petitioner is pending with the first respondent, this Court hereby directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and act in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of this order. 5.With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 16.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Trichy City. 2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Trichy South Sub-Division Trichy City. 3. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police, K.K.Nagar Sub-Division, Trichy City. 4. The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy City. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 P.DHANABAL , J. PNM ORDER IN W.P(MD)No.10477 of 2025 16.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis