MATA PRASAD PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/3514/2024 · 2025-04-04
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133331 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133331 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18759-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3514 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mata Prasad Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Arjun Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has instructions to the effect that though an order was passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and pillars had also been installed demarcating the boundaries, however, possession cannot be given to the petitioner on account of temporary injunction by the civil court in suit no.1066/2023 relating to the adjacent Gata No.1547Ga which according to him is affected by the order passed under Section 24 of the Code, 2006.
3. If it is so then the Sub-Divisional Magistrate should pass an
order on the records and communicate it to the petitioner who may pursue the remedies as may be prescribed.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. a (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 4.4.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench