LATEEF AHMED AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
CWP/2689/2021 · 2025-02-20
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133301 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133301 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 245
CWP-2689-2021
Date of decision: 20.02.2025
Lateef Ahmed and others ...Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
***** Present : None for the petitioners.
Mr. Arun Gosain, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI.
Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 5. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 5 states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of the fact that the period for which the teachers code was withdrawn stands expired.
2.
Disposed of, reserving the liberty to the petitioners to represent the respondents, in case any grievance still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 20.02.2025 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned
: Yes / No
Whether reportable
: Yes / No HAMANT 2025.02.20 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document