1 APHC010160652023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2103/2023 Between: 1. BA AND KR MCA COLLEGE, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI. B. KOTIREDDY DODAVARAPPADU, NH - 5, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. BA AND KR DEGREE AND PG COLLEGE, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI. KATA SRINIVASA REDDY NEAR POLERAMMA TEMPLE, BALAJIRAOPET, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. G JAYALAKSHMI I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TULLURU, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. K HARSHAVARDHAN, DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI M M NAIKM I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFAFARE DEPARTMENT, TULLURU, SECRETARIT, BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SMT M JANAKI I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, TULLURU, SECRETARIT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 6. SMT B LAVANYA VENI I A S, THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFAFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNEMNT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. RR 4 TO 6 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.06.02.2025, VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2025 IN CC NO.2103 OF 2023. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NISCHALA REDDY 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3. C SUMON 4. S PRANATHI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Marella Srilakshmi, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Mathukumilli Sri Vijay, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Smt. S. Pranathi, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6. 2. Smt. S. Pranathi, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 submits that the Order of this Court has been complied with. This fact is confirmed by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners. 3. In this view of the matter, no further consideration is necessary. Contempt Case is, accordingly, closed. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 24.07.2025 Vns