PARAM SUKH PAL AND 5 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/3938/2025 · 2025-04-10
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133296 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133296 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20328 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3938 of 2025 Petitioner :- Param Sukh Pal And 5 Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Urban Development And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Pandey,Krishna Kumar Singh,Shashwat Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed, the notice to opposite party No.3 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, specifically the opposite party No.3 to count the services of the petitioners rendered as daily wage employees on their respective posts i.e. Pump Attendant, Meter Reader in Jalkal Vibhag, Raebareli, run and managed by Nagar Palika Parishad, Raebareli."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of their grievance, the petitioners have preferred a representation dated 01.03.2025 to the opposite party No.3, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioners are ready to prefer their separate fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, they may be permitted to prefer their separate fresh representations to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/ her to consider and decide the said representations within a stipulated time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has stated that he has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners within a stipulated time. 7.
In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioners to prefer their separate fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Raebareli taking all pleas and grounds which are available with them annexing therewith copy of their earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of their claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representations are preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representations of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition say within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioners forthwith. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench