HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8466 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State-respondent no.1, and Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to the respondent authorities to allot a 10% residential plot in the development area, in terms of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Gajraj v. State of U.P. and Others, 2011 (11) ADJ-I. 3. The controversy raised in the instant petition stands squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31.05.2022 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Runwell India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Others (Writ-C No. 14113 of 2017). We are in respectful agreement with the said decision. Consequently, the present writ petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed in terms of the judgment rendered in Runwell India Pvt. Ltd. (supra). September 17, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ramendra Pratap Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Pooran Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad