Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13326 (KAR)

SRI BASAVANNA MUTT v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/6128/2020 · 2025-01-22

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2707 WP No. 6128 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6128 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. BASAVANNA MUTT HALAGUR VILLAGE, KEREGODU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 430, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, SRI.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASTRI GANAPATI SHRIPAD., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571 401. 2. TAHASILDAR, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2707 WP No. 6128 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Sri.Shastri Ganapati Shripad., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the annual tastik amount of Rs.1,04,068/- to the petitioner mutt from 01.04.2018 along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The petitioner is a Mutt situated at Halagur Village, Kereodu Hobli, Malavalli Taluk, Mandya District. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Government has not released Tastik amount. Accordingly, it made representations vide Annexures-C and D. It appears that the Deputy Commissioner and the Tahsildar have not considered the representations. Hence, this Court deems it proper to direct the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner. 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner vide - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2707 WP No. 6128 of 2020 Annexure-C and D in accordance with the law if not considered as of today, within eight weeks from the date of certified copy of this order. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 28