Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133251 (ALL)

ADITYA KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/3859/2025 · 2025-04-11

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20788 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3859 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aditya Kumar And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Dairy Development Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava,Akshat Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shanker Lal Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Akshat Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1 & 2 and Sri Shanker Lal, learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 to 5. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of salary and other service benefits to the petitioners regularly every month without any hindrance. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of arrears of salary to the petitioners with effect from the date it due i.e. from the month of May 2019 up till date along with other service benefits forthwith. (iii). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to give service benefits of second selection grade of one special increment and second promotional pay scale on completion of 19 years and 24 years of continuous satisfactory services at an early date. (iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of interest to the petitioners upon the arrear of salary and other service dues to the petitioners with effect from the date it become due up till the date of actual payment." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at some length submitted that in the interest of justice necessary directions be issued to the respondent no.2 to examine the grievance of the petitioners and decide the same within a stipulated period fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to this prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. I have considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of finally with liberty to the petitioners to approach the respondent no.2 by way of making afresh representation alongwith a certified copy of this order within period of fifteen days from today. In case, such a representation is made by the petitioners, the respondent no.2 will consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within period of two months from the date of presentation of such representation. The respondent no.2 will also ensure payment of the above dues of the petitioners which is admissible to them, in accordance with law, within the aforesaid period. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 11.4.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench