RSA-1611- IN THE HIG 221 Fuman Singh Balwant Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby his 2. 3. notice in the request of le 23.07.2014, 15.09.2014, finally, vide was issued b also directed repeatedly a many as 12.10.2018, -2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Singh Versus nt Singh M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiff is in rrent judgments and decrees rendere by his suit for permanent injunction wa The matter pertains to the year Perusal of the order-sheet(s in the present appeal, the same was t of learned counsel for 13 dates i.e. 2014, 14.10.2014, 28.10.2014, 14.11.2 2014, 22.12.2014, 26.03.2015, 10.0 vide order dated 02.02.2016 notice o sued by the Predecessor Bench of thi irected to maintain status quo. Ther edly adjourned for effecting service as for 07 dates i.e. on 09.08.201 2018, 27.08.2019, 28.01.2020 and 17 ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1611-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA in second appeal against the endered by both the Courts below tion was dismissed. year 2014. s) reveals that before issuing was constantly adjourned at the es i.e. on 26.03.2014, 22.05.2014, 4.11.2014, 18.11.2014, 04.12.2014, , 10.09.2015 and 06.10.2015; and otice of motion in the present appeal of this Court; and the parties were Thereafter, again the matter was rvice upon the sole respondent as .08.2017, 15.12.2017, 20.04.2018, 17.01.2023; out of which on 02 the low uing the 014, 014, and peal ere was t as 018, n 02 RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.18 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1611- dates of hea un-represent for the appe sought time 12.11.2025 appellant till 4. despite the c 5. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c stay for the appellant/his pursuing the except to dis 6. 7. 17.11.2025 rishu -2014 (O&M) -2- of hearing i.e. 12.10.2018 and 27.08. resented. On the last date of hearing e appellant had informed that the so t time to implead his legal representativ 25, no application has been filed ant till date for impleading the LRs of Today, none has put in appearan e the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. More so, the r the last more than 09 years. Therefo /his LRs if any, nor his counse ng the present matter. Thus, this Cou dismiss the same for non-prosecuti Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 27.08.2019 the appellant had gone earing 18.03.2025, learned counsel the sole appellant had expired and sentatives. As per office report dated filed by learned counsel for the Rs of deceased-appellant. pearance on behalf of the appellant, facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly , the appellant is enjoying ex parte herefore, it is clear that neither the counsel is seriously interested in is Court is left with no other option osecution. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No one nsel and ated the lant, llant sent the the ly r the in tion RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.18 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.