Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13321 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR@ SUNIL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/15833/2022 · 2025-03-18

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39598 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15833 of 2022 Applicant :- Sunil Kumar@ Sunil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sourabh Pathak,Vandeep Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State is present. 2. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant-Sunil Kumar@ Sunil, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.103 of 2020, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kotwali Lotan, District Siddharth Nagar. 3. This is a second bail application. The first bail application on behalf of the applicant was rejected by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 6.8.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.19253 of 2021. 4. A report regarding status of trial was called for vide order dated 20.2.2025 by a coordinate Bench of this Court. As per the report dated 28.2.2025 of Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Court No.1, Siddharthnagar duly forwarded by the District Judge, Siddharthnagar it is apparent that the trial of the present matter has been decided on 8.8.2023. 5. In view of the said report, the present bail application has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad