Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8049 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/75/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kapruwan, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Petitioner claims to be a project affected person, as his land was allegedly acquired for Tehri Dam Project. He has staked claim for appointment on the post of Legal Assistant.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the policy was formulated by the State Government under which petitioner is entitled for appointment.
5. Learned State Counsel, however, disputes the said submission and submits that petitioner do not have any vested right of appointment.
6. Be that as it may, since petitioner has made a representation to the Director, Rehabilitation, Tehri Dam Project, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director to take decision on petitioner’s representation, within four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
11.09.2025
Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb 4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653 D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.09.12 10:17:50 +05'30'