ARJUN PRASAD DUBEY v. U.P. COOPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/3921/2025 · 2025-04-10
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133172 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133172 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20347 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3921 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arjun Prasad Dubey Respondent :- U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. Thru. Managing Director Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Gupta,Swati Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Shireesh Kumar Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite parties, the same is taken on record. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(I) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payments of post retiral dues/ benefits o the petitioner as early as possible."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the authorities concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representations to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/ her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 6.
In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e. the Managing Director (Administrative) PCF Ltd. 32, Station Road, Lucknow, U.P. taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any,
and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition say within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench