KHURSHID AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/3109/2025 · 2025-04-15
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133163 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133163 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21076 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3109 of 2025 Applicant :- Khurshid Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Tripathi,Mukesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1.Vakalatnama filed by Ms. Sudha Pal, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.2, is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.
3. The instant application has been filed seeking the following relief:
"Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the charge sheet dated 12/05/2022 relating to Case Crime No.70/2022 under Section 323, 504, 506, 352 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v-a) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Bazaar Shukl, District Amethi and summoning order dated 20/10/2022 passed in Case No.1070/2022 State versus Khurshid Ahmad by Special Judge SC ST Act Sultanpur and as well entire criminal proceedings arising there from."
4. The parties have entered into a compromise and a compromise deed in this regard has been filed which has been verified by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Sultanpur copy of report of Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is annexed at Annexure No.7 of the Application.
5. As the parties have entered into a compromise which fact is not denied by Ms. Sudha Pal, Advocate appearing for the opposite party no.2, therefore, present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed in terms of compromise between the parties.
6. In view of the compromise entered into between the parties, the proceedings of Case No.1070/2022, State versus Khurshid Ahmad arising out of Case Crime No.70/2022 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 352 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)
(v-a) of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Bazaar Shukl, District Amethi pending in the Court of Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Sultanpur is hereby quashed. Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Mohit Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench