SNEHIL SHARMA WIFE OF SH. SIDDHARTH MANGAL D/O SH. JUGAL KISHOR VYAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/405/2025 · 2025-04-01
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13313 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13313 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14516] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 405/2025
1. Snehil Sharma Wife Of Sh. Siddharth Mangal D/o Sh. Jugal Kishor Vyas, Aged About 31 Years, Permanent Resident Of Near Balaji Chowk, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
2. Siddharth Mangal Son Of Sh. Ganesh Narayan Mangal, Aged About 28 Years, Permanent Resident Of Ward No. 32, Gangapur, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
5. Sh.jugal Kishor Vyas Son Of Sh. Ghasi Lal Vyas, Resident Of Near Balaji Chowk, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur. ( Rajasthan).
6. Smt. Nirmala Vyas Wife Of Sh. Jugal Kishor Vyas, Resident Of Near Balaji Chowk, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
7. Sumit Vyas Son Of Jugal Kishor Vyas, Resident Of Near Balaji Chowk, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
8. Rohit Vyas Son Of Jugal Kishor Vyas, Resident Of Near Balaji Chowk, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Babu Khandelwal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 01/04/2025 : Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w 315(h)(i) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 has been preferred on behalf of petitioners praying interalia that a direction be
[2025:RJ-JP:14516] (2 of 2) [CRLW-405/2025] issued to the respondents to provide an adequate security & protection to them on the ground that they are facing grave threat to their life & liberty at the hands of the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate representation before the concerned Nodal Officer/authority in the light of the judgment/order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Suman Meena & Another Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.792/2024, decided on 02.08.2024. Permission as sought for is granted. The present writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, if any such application/representation is filed by the petitioners, the concerned Nodal Officer/authority is directed to pass a reasoned & speaking order within a period of fifteen-days from the date of receipt of representation alongwith certified copy of this order. It is made clear that the same shall be taken into consideration in accordance with law and the concerned Nodal Officer/authority shall make sure that no harm is caused to the life & liberty of the petitioners. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J ASHOK/