Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20345 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3925 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Surya Mukhi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Bhan Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vijay Pratap Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. However, notices on behalf of opposite party Nos.2 and 3 have been accepted by Sri Vijay Pratap Singh, learned counsel. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(I) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to release the outstanding amount of Rs.3,36,429/- 50% as arrears of the 7th Pay Commission and revised pension arrears along with 12 % interest. (II) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner, contained as Annexure No.6 to this writ petition." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred various representations to the authorities concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representations to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/ her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has stated that he has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 7. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Apar Mukhya Adhikari, Zila Panchayat, Raebareli taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition say within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench