HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.2337 of 2024 Nipul @ Chhota ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. With First Bail Application No.2381 of 2024 Ankush @ Ranjha ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Since both these bail applications arise from one and the same FIR, they are decided by this common order. 2. Applicants Nipul @ Chhota and Ankush @ Ranjha are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 554 of 2024, under Section 307, 336 IPC, applicant Nipul @ Chhota is in judicial custody under Section 25 (1-B) (A) of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Kotwali Manglour, District Haridwar. They have sought their release on bail. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2 4. According to the FIR, Police received an information in evening of 30.06.2024 that some persons while moving on the cars are opening fires. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that it is no injury case. 6. Learned State counsel admits this fact. 7. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail. 8. The bail applications are allowed. 9. Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties by each one of them, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 07.01.2025 Jitendra