Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133094 (ALL)

MELADIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. SUGAR INDUSTRIES LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3834/2025 · 2025-04-11

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20789 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3834 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meladin Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Sugar Industries Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar,Prince Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akhilesh Pratap Singh,Brijendra Singh,Indu Prakash Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Prince Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Brajendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1, Sri Brijndra Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, Sri Subhash Singh holding brief of Sri Indu Prakash Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3 and Sri Akhilesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.4. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- " Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of retirel dues i.e. arrear of salary, Leave Encashment, Gratuity and Provident Fund etc. along with prevalent rate of interest, till it is actually paid to the petitioner." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.3 i.e. General Manager, Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Limited, Sultanpur taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. . (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Order Date :- 11.4.2025 dk/ Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench