Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13308 (AP)

Smt. Tadiboina Sujatha v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/8315/2025 · 2025-04-01

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010158222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8315/2025 Between: Smt. Tadiboina Sujatha ...PETITIONER AND The Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BATHINA RATNAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2 CGR, J W.P.No.8315 of 2025 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly writ of Mandumas, declaring the Order vide letter No. CO- ERD-DA-2409-2024 dated 22.03.2024 passed by the respondent No.3 imposing penalty of Compulsory Retirement under Regulation 4(h) of Union Bank Of India Officer Employees' (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 on the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the order dated 22.03.2024 and direct the respondent No.2 to reinstate the petitioner to the position of Assistant Manager with the Union Bank of India and to pay the petitioner her back wages in the interest of justice.…” (in verbatim) 2. Heard Sri Bathina Ratnakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Sri A. Ravindra Babu, learned counsel for the 1st respondent. 3. The petitioner is challenging the order vide CO:ERC:DA:2409:2024, dated 22.03.2024, issued by the 3rd respondent, exercising powers under Regulation 4(h) of the Union Bank of India Officer Employees’ (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976, (for short, ‘the Regulations, 1976’), imposing the major punishment of compulsory retirement. 4. Against the aforesaid order passed by the 3rd respondent, an appeal is stated to be provided for under the same Regulations before the appellate authority. 3 CGR, J W.P.No.8315 of 2025 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks liberty to approach the appellate authority. 6. Recording the said submission, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority, as provided under the provisions of the Regulations, 1976. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN 1st April 2025 cbn 4 CGR, J W.P.No.8315 of 2025 159 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8315/2025 1st April, 2025 cbn