SUMIT SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER
CRLRD/168/2025 · 2025-04-24
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133073 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133073 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23290 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 168 of 2025 Revisionist :- Sumit Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Vikas Pandey,Syed Kamil Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Vikas Pandey, learned counsel for revisionist as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. Learned counsel for revisionist at the very outset submits that due to change circumstance, revisionist does not want to press this revision and prayed for withdrawal of this revision.
3. Learned A.G.A. does not have any objection to the aforesaid request.
4. Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench