DHARMENDRA DWIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/3920/2025 · 2025-04-10
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133062 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 133062 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20348 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3920 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dharmendra Dwivedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State- opposite party Nos.1 & 2. 2. In view of the proposed order, the notice to opposite party No.3 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(I) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay Honorarium/ Salary to the petitioner for the period of 20.03.2023 to 26.07.2024 with 12% interest per annum."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 06.02.2025 to the authority concerned, but no decision has been taken on the same till date. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority and direction may be issued him/ her to consider and decide the said representation within a stipulated time. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction is issued to the Competent Authority to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a stipulated time. 7.
In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e. the Mission Director, Rashtriya Khadya Suraksha Mission/ Additional
Drector, Agriculture, Uppar Krishi Nideshak (Beej Evem Prakshetra) Krishi Bhawan, Lucknow, U.P. taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him annexing therewith copy of his earlier representation, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of fifteen days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition say within a period of two months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this
order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith.
8. In view of the aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition is
disposed of finally. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench