Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13306 (JHR)

JANESHWAR RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WPC/2464/2023 · 2025-08-07

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2464 of 2023 Janeshwar Ram, aged about 56 years, S/o Mundrika Ram, R/o Village-Gawn Khap, PO- Kusha Naraenpur, PS- Hussainabad, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi office at- Deputy Commissioner office, Ranchi, PO & PS- Ranchi, Jharkhand, 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau Division, Daltonganj, Office At- Deputy Commissioner, Palamau office, PO & PS- Sadar Police Station, District- Ranchi, Jahrkhand, 3. The Deputy Collector (Land Reforms & Revenue), Ranchi, Office At- Ranchi secretariats, PO & PS- Sadar Police Station, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand, 4. The Circle Officer, Nagadi Ranchi, office At- Nagadi Block office, PO & PS- Nagadi, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Ranchi, office At- SDO, office Ranchi, PO & PS- Sadar Police Station, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand …... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Prakash, AC to S.C.-IV --------- 05/Dated:07 th August, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :- (a) for quashing of order dated 02.03.2020 passed in Mutation Case No. 3652/2019-20 at Annexure – 3, passed by Respondent No.4, wherein the respondent No.4 has cancelled the long running jamabandi, wherein the land in question is Garmajarua Malik and recorded in favour of Sekh Mohiuddin Sah and other in Khata No. 383, Plot no. 617 in Muja Pundag. (b) The petitioner further prays to direct the respondents specifically respondent No.4 to - 1 - W.P.C No.2464 of 2023 2025:JHHC:22223 Mutation in Khata No. 383, Plot no. 617 in Muja Pundag in favour of the petitioner. 2. There is hierarchy of courts and there is provisions to prefer appeal and revision also. 3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - W.P.C No.2464 of 2023