Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13304 (UTT)

SATISH KUMAR v. VARUNA AGARWAL

CLCON/441/2024 · 2025-02-17

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:1074 CLCON No.441 of 2024 Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mahavir Kohli, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned counsel, for the petitioner. 2. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel, for the respondent. 3. The respondent has filed a response affidavit, and in paragraph 13 of the said affidavit, it has been categorically stated that by the order complained of the respondents were directed to decide the application under Section 41 of the Land Revenue Act, moved by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of the passing of the order dated 08.12.2023. The said application has now been decided, and rejected by the respondent on the ground that the application for demarcation is not maintainable. 4. Since the order dated 08.12.2023, has been complied with, and sufficient compliance has been done, accordingly the contempt petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.02.2025 NR/