Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13303 (RAJ)

SMT. SANTOSH KUMARI MEENA D/O LATE SHRI PRABHU NARAYAN MEENA W/O SHRI PUKHRAJ MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4484/2025 · 2025-03-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14307] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4484/2025 Smt. Santosh Kumari Meena D/o Late Shri Prabhu Narayan Meena W/o Shri Pukhraj Meena, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of A-411, Shyam Sarovar Colony, Jaipur Road, Dausa ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Agriculture Marketing, Agriculture Marketing Directorate, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh Mr. Sachit Singh Mr. Hari Kishan Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in light of D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.662/2022 qua S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4064/2022 titled as Jahangir Ali Khan vs. State Of Rajasthan & anr. wherein, vide order dated 25.05.2022, it is held that the suspension orders are amenable, before the learned RAT. Therefore, the present petition may be disposed of in light of the same. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, this Court directs the learned RAT to consider the appeal, if any, preferred by the petitioner herein, and decide the same in accordance with law [2025:RJ-JP:14307] (2 of 2) [CW-4484/2025] and the directions spelled out in SBCWP No. 2335/2025 titled as Mohammad Kasif vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/128