Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 133023 (ALL)

SUMITRA DEVI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/3461/2025 · 2025-04-16

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21318-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3461 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumitra Devi And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nitin Kumar Mishra,Kamlesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. (Order on Application for Amendment) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for amendment today in the Court, which is taken on record. Application for amendment is allowed. Let necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. (Order on Memo of Writ Petition) The petitioners allege unnecessary interference in their peaceful possession and title in respect of the shops, which have been allotted by the Ayodhya Development Authority, details of which have been given in para 5 of the Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Ayodhya Development Authority does not dispute the fact that the petitioners were allotted the aforesaid shops. Learned Additional C.S.C. does not have instructions. Considering the relief sought, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the observation/direction that if the petitioners are owners of the shops in question, then the opposite parties shall not interfere in their possession or title, unless and until the said shops or the land on which the said shops exist, is acquired or purchased as per law. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 16.4.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench