Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
1. 240 (18 cases)
LPA No.105 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2025
State of Haryana and others …Appellants
Versus
Damyanti …Respondent
2.
LPA No.447 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Smt. Nirmala
...Respondent
3.
LPA No.487 of 2025(O&M) State of Haryana & others
...Appellants
Versus Rajpal
...Respondent
4.
LPA No.297 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana & others
...Appellants
Versus Foolpati @ Phoolar
...Respondent
5.
LPA No.517 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Azad Singh and others
...Respondents SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -2-
6.
LPA No.678 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Pawan Kumar and another
...Respondent
7.
LPA No.690 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Sajjan Singh and another
...Respondent
8.
LPA No.666 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Raja Ram
...Respondent
9.
LPA No.605 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Harkesh
...Respondent
10.
LPA No.588 of 2025 (O&M)
The State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Dharampal and others
...Respondents
11.
LPA No.613 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Leela Devi and another
...Respondents SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -3-
12.
LPA No.614 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Anand Singh and others
...Respondents
13.
LPA No.257 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Smt. Sona Devi and others
...Respondents
14.
LPA No.269 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Jai Parkash
...Respondent
15.
LPA No.325 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Laxmi Devi
...Respondent
16.
LPA No.365 of 2025 (O&M)
Bina
...Appellant
Versus State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
17.
LPA No.157 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Ramesh Kumar
...Respondent SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -4-
18.
LPA No.176 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Dharam Pal
...Respondent
19.
LPA No.900 of 2025 (O&M)
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Raghbir Singh
...Respondent 20 (241)
LPA No.951 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Krishan
...Respondent
21. (242)
LPA No.1123 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Sita
...Respondent
22. (244)
LPA No.1324 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Ramesh Kumar
...Respondent
23. (245)
LPA No.1325 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Nachhatar Singh
...Respondent SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -5-
24. (246)
LPA No.385 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Raj Kumar
...Respondent
25. (112-6 cases)
LPA No.1003 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Ram Kumar
...Respondent
26.
LPA No.1007 of 2025 (O&M) The State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Partap and others
...Respondents
27.
LPA No.1018 of 2025 (O&M) The State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Pala Ram and another
...Respondents
28.
LPA No.1048 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Raj Pal and others
...Respondents
29.
LPA No.1053 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Naresh Kumar
...Respondent SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -6-
30.
LPA No.1063 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and another
...Appellants
Versus Gurmail Singh
...Respondent
31. (113)
LPA No.1020 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Billo Devi
...Respondent
32. (115)
LPA No.1103 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Sewa Ram
...Respondent
33. (116)
LPA No.1107 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and another
...Appellants
Versus Nand Lal
...Respondent
34. (117)
LPA No.1173 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Kamlesh and others
...Respondent
35. (118)
LPA No.1198 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Subh Ram and another
...Respondents SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -7-
36. (119)
LPA No.1241 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Bijender Singh
...Respondent
37. (122)
LPA No.1445 of 2025 (O&M) State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus Hans Raj and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl. AG, Haryana
for the appellants.
None for the appellant (in LPA No.365 of 2025).
* * * * SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA J.(Oral)
1.
All these matters relate to the issue on two aspects, one is with regard to grant of the benefit of Old Pension Scheme to the writ-petitioners and the other is with regard to giving them the benefit of regularization Policy dated 01.10.2003 without considering whether they have worked for 240 days in each of the three years preceding the date of Policy.
2.
Relying on the law, a Division Bench of this Court passed an
order in LPA No.2356 of 2024 decided on 26.09.2024 titled as “State of Haryana and others vs. Sher Singh” holding the concerned writ-petitioners entitled for the benefit as claimed by them noticed above.
3.
However, we have taken note of the fact that with regard to the same set of cases, certain SLPs were preferred before the Supreme Court one SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA No.105 of 2025 and other connected cases -8-
of them is Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.112/2025 tilted as “State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Sushil” and the other is having Diary No.56458/2024 whereas in the meantime, the Apex Court stayed the operation and effect of the judgment. We, therefore, are of the view that we should await the final
judgment to be rendered by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in these cases and the present appeals, which many of them are highly belated, need not be kept pending before us.
4.
Accordingly, we dispose of all these appeals with observations that whatever is the final verdict rendered by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in SLP No.112/2025 shall govern the fate to all the respondents herein. It is made clear that till disposal of the said SLP, no contempt proceedings would be initiated on account of non-implementation of the order of the learned Single Judge. At the same time, the claim of the writ-petitioners would also not be frustrated if the order is ultimately passed against the State by Hon’ble the Supreme Court.
5.
All the pending misc. application(s) in each case also stand
disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
May 14, 2025
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) seema
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable:
Yes/No SEEMA SHARMA 2025.05.21 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment